31 rows — 27 kings.
Thirty-one rows with 27 kings bringing an end to the kings of the Fourteenth Dynasty. The invading Hyksos kings of the Fifteenth Dynasty are included, which confim that the list of kings was seemingly compiled without bias.
| Rows | Remarks | Kings |
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | Fourteenth Dynasty (continued) | 3 |
| 4 | Lacuna (Fourteenth Dynasty) | 1 |
| 5–15 | Fourteenth Dynasty | 11 |
| 16–20 | Lacuna (Fourteenth Dynasty) | 5 |
| 21 | Summation for the Fourteenth Dynasty | |
| 22 | Lacuna (Heading Fifteenth Dynasty) | |
| 23–25 | Lacuna (Fifteenth Dynasty) | 3 |
| 26–28 | Fifteenth Dynasty | 3 |
| 29 | Summation for Fifteenth Dynasty | |
| 30 | Heading for the Sixteenth Dynasty | |
| 31 | Sixteenth Dynasty | 1 |
Column 10.1
The Dual King ...ra ...
nsw-bit rꜤ...
King
Unknown (167th king)
Dynasty
XIV (31)
Fragment(s)
105
Gardiner
X 1
Only the opening cartouche with the divine sun-disc remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.2
The Dual King ...
nsw-bit ...
King
Unknown (168th king)
Dynasty
XIV (32)
Fragment(s)
105
Gardiner
X 2
Only the partial title remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.3
The Dual King ...
nsw-bit ...
King
Unknown (169th king)
Dynasty
XIV (33)
Fragment(s)
105
Gardiner
X 3
Only the partial title remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.4
King
Unknown (170th king)
Dynasty
XIV (34)
Fragment(s)
105
Gardiner
X 4
The entire row is lost in lacuna.
Column 10.5
The Dual King ...ra ...
nsw-bit ...rꜤ ...
King
Unknown (171st king)
Dynasty
XIV (35)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 5
Only traces of the title and opening cartouche remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.6
The Dual King ...ra ...
nsw-bit ...rꜤ ...
King
Unknown (172nd king)
Dynasty
XIV (36)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 6
Only the title and the opening cartouche remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.7
The Dual King Senefer...ra ...
nsw-bit s-nfr...rꜤ ...
King
Unknown (173rd king)
Dynasty
XIV (37)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 7
This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.1
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 380 (File 14/43)
Column 10.8
The Dual King Men...ra ...
nsw-bit mn...rꜤ ...
King
Unknown (174th king)
Dynasty
XIV (38)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 8
This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.1
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 380 (File 14/44)
Column 10.9
The Dual King Djed...
nsw-bit ḏd...
King
Unknown (175th king)
Dynasty
XIV (39)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 9
This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.1
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 380 (File 14/45)
Column 10.10
King
Unknown (176th king)
Dynasty
XIV (40)
Fragment(s)
108
Gardiner
X 10
Only traces of the title remain, the name is lost.
Column 10.11
King
Unknown (177th king)
Dynasty
XIV (41)
Fragment(s)
112
Gardiner
X 12
A horizontal fibre-match between fr. 112 and fr. 100 in column 9 to the right shows that it should be moved up one line compared to Gardiner.1 The name is lost, only a tiny trace of the title remain.
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 24 (§1.1.3.2.4)
Column 10.12
King
Unknown (178th king)
Dynasty
XIV (42)
Fragment(s)
112
Gardiner
X 13
Only a few traces of an unreadable name remains. A horizontal fibre-match between fr. 112 and fr. 100 in column 9 to the right shows that it should be moved up one line compared to Gardiner.1
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 24 (§1.1.3.2.4)
Column 10.13
King
Unknown (179th king)
Dynasty
XIV (43)
Fragment(s)
112
Gardiner
X 14
A horizontal fibre-match between fr. 112 and fr. 100 in column 9 to the right shows that it should be moved up one line compared to Gardiner.1 The king is otherwise unattested.2
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 24 (§1.1.3.2.4)
- 2 Ryholt 1997: 380 (File 14/49)
Column 10.14
King
Unknown (180th king)
Dynasty
XIV (44)
Fragment(s)
112
Gardiner
X 15
A horizontal fibre-match between fr. 112 and fr. 100 in column 9 to the right shows that it should be moved up one line compared to Gardiner.1 This unknown king is otherwise unattested.2
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 24 (§1.1.3.2.4)
- 2 Ryholt 1997: 380 (File 14/50)
Column 10.15
King
Unknown (181st king)
Dynasty
XIV (45)
Fragment(s)
112
Gardiner
X 16
A horizontal fibre-match between fr. 112 and fr. 100 in column 9 to the right shows that it should be moved up one line compared to Gardiner.1
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 24 (§1.1.3.2.4)
Column 10.16
King
Unknown (182nd king)
Dynasty
XIV (46)
Fragment(s)
112
The entire row is lost.
Column 10.17
King
Unknown (183rd king)
Dynasty
XIV (47)
Fragment(s)
–
The papyrus is lost.
Column 10.18
King
Unknown (184th king)
Dynasty
XIV (48)
Fragment(s)
–
The papyrus is lost.
Column 10.19
King
Unknown (185th king)
Dynasty
XIV (49)
Fragment(s)
–
The papyrus is lost.
Column 10.20
King
Unknown (186th king)
Dynasty
XIV (50)
Fragment(s)
–
The papyrus is lost.
Column 10.21
Fragment(s)
?
Gardiner
X /13
Summation of the Fourteenth Dynasty. Ryholt moved Gardiner's placement of the fragment down eight lines,1 According to Manetho, 76 kings ruled the Fourteenth Dynasty for a total of 184 years.2 Note that the tenatively traced hieratic signs are from the poor photo of Farina, and in dire need of improvement.3
Restoration
Ryholt, Political Situation, 25-26
Total: x kings. They made up
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 25-26., fig. 11 p. 95
- 2 Adler and Tuffin, The Chronography of George Synkellos, 86f.
- 3 Farina 1938: plate X
Column 10.22
Fragment(s)
?
Gardiner
X /14
Possibly contained the heading for the Fifteenth Dynasty of foreign kings (Hyksos) that conquered the northern parts of the kingdom.
Column 10.23
King
Unknown (187th king)
Dynasty
XV (1)
Fragment(s)
–
Since title is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed Ruler of foreign lands 
(ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt ) appeared here,1 instead of the regular nsw-bit .
(- 1 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.24
King
Unknown (188th king)
Dynasty
XV (2)
Fragment(s)
–
Since title is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed Ruler of foreign lands (ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt ) appeared here,1 instead of the regular nsw-bit .
(- 1 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.25
King
Unknown (189th king)
Dynasty
XV (3)
Fragment(s)
–
Since title is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed Ruler of foreign lands (ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt ) appeared here,1 instead of the regular nsw-bit .
(- 1 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.26
King
Khyan (190th king)
Dynasty
XV (4)
Fragment(s)
X/16-17
Gardiner
X /16
The number may be a 10, 20, or 30, as only a trace of the right leg of the ten-sign remain.1 The signs are slightly uncertain, traced from the poor photo of Farina. Since title is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed Ruler of foreign lands (ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt ) appeared here,1 instead of the regular nsw-bit .
(- 1 Ryholt 1997: 119, note 398
- 2 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.27
King
Apepi (191st king)
Dynasty
XV (5)
Fragment(s)
X16-17 + X/20-21
Gardiner
X /17
Of the kings of this Dynasty, only Apepi is known to have ruled for more than 30 years, so this is normally ascribed to him. The signs are slightly uncertain, traced from the poor photo of Farina. Since the start of the row is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed title ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt appeared here,1 instead the regular nsw-bit .
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.28
King
Khamudy (192nd king)
Dynasty
XV (6)
Fragment(s)
X/20-21
Gardiner
X /20
Since the title is lost, there is no evidence either way that the often claimed Ruler of foreign lands (ḥḳꜢ-ḫꜢswt ) appeared here,1 instead of nsw-bit which is recorded for all other kings.
(- 1 Ryholt 1997: 123ff.; Ryholt 2004: 142
Column 10.29
Fragment(s)
X/20-21
Gardiner
X /21
Following the clear 100-sign there is a horizontal trace of a lost number that is not as read by Gardiner as an eight,1 but more likely a 40, 60, or 80.2 The number of years can thus be somewhere in the 140-189 range. According to Manetho, six foreign kings from Phoenicia ruled the Fifteenth Dynasty for a total of 284 years.3
- 1 Gardiner 1959: 17 (X 21 b)
- 2 Schneider, Khyan’s Place in History, 277ff.
- 3 Adler and Tuffin, The Chronography of George Synkellos, 86f.
Column 10.30
...
...
Fragment(s)
–
This lost row recorded the heading for the Sixteenth Dynasty.1
- 1 Ryholt 2004: 140 (Table 3)
Column 10.31
King
Unknown (193rd king)
Dynasty
XVI (1)
It is clear that the lost record of the first king of the Sixteenth Dynasty must have stood in the last line of column 10.1 From the emended fifteen kings in the summation of the dynasty (11.15) it is clear that one missing king must have been present after the lost heading of the dynasty (10.30), adding to the 14 kings present (11.1-14).2
- 1 Ryholt 1997: 151
- 2 Beckerath 1964: 168-169, 194-195
