The Tenth Dynasty
It seems likely that the epitomator(s) misunderstood the summation for the Herakleopolitan dynasty, and mistook it for a separate dynasty. Africanus give 19 + 19 kings for the two dynasties, while Eusebius give 4 + 19 kings. The number of years also differ, and It stands to reason that the an epitomator misinterpreted a summation of the Herakleopolitan Dynasty and multiplied it as a new dynasty, substantiated by the same number of kings (19) for both dynasties, with no names mentioned.
The chronological order
It is important to note that the chronological order of the pharaohs is an evolving subject and should therefore be treated with a certain degree of caution. As new research is conducted, the order may be subject to change, which is a fundamental principle that applies to all Egyptian dynasties.
№ | Pharaoh | Also known as |
---|---|---|
1 | AAAA | AAAA |
2 | BBBB | BBBB |
3 | CCCC | CCCC |
4 | DDDD | DDDD |
The Tenth Dynasty according to Manetho
The contents of their epitomes of Aegyptiaka must have been quite different, as can be seen from the differences between the more complete text of Africanus and the missing information of Eusebius.
Tenth dynasty of 19 kings of Herakleopolis
These reigned for185 years
Tenth dynasty of 19 kings of Herakleopolis
These reigned for185 years
Tenth dynasty of 19 kings from Heracleopolis
who reigned185 years